“At half-past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for, er, over, a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning.”
Peter Power, Visor Consultants, during an interview on Radio 5 Live, on the afternoon of July 7th 2005.
On March 4th 2008, a Google Video search for ‘London bombings’ produced 918 films, of varying quality and length, almost all of which relate to the documentary, LUDICROUS DIVERSION, David Shaylor’s film, MIND THE GAP, or Alex Jones’ TERRORSTORM.
Each of the filmmakers examine the known facts, unanswered questions, eye-witness accounts and scientific evidence, as well as the explicit deception of the state’s version of events, compliantly portrayed by the mainstream media, in its abject failure to question the official story.
Here is the still little-known list of inconsistencies:
1. The train that the four bombers allegedly caught from Luton station was cancelled, making it physically impossible that the accused were in London in time to carry out the attacks.
2. Former senior police officer, Peter Power, and his company, Visor Consultants, were employed by an as yet unnamed company to run a fake terrorist attack at exactly the same time, at exactly the same stations. Their simulation mirrored the alleged attacks to the letter.
Peter Power interview on ITV News
3. The only CCTV footage of the alleged bombers that has reached the public domain are a clearly doctored still image at the entrance to Luton station, and two stills of Hasib Hussein, apparently visiting WH Smith and MacDonald’s in Kings Cross. All other cameras on their journey into the transport network of central London, according to the Metropolitan Police, failed to record that morning. As did the cameras on the number 30 bus.
4. Several survivors of the tube attacks reported to the media in the mayhem of the initial aftermath that the explosions took place under the carriages, rather than in the carriages themselves. Survivors of the bus bombing saw no Asian men on the bottom floor of the number 30 bus.
5. The number 30 bus was unexpectedly rerouted that morning. Several eye witnesses on the scheduled route have said that the bus was re-directed to Tavistock Square by undercover police officers.
6. Israeli minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was pre-warned of the imminence of the first explosion, allegedly by Scotland Yard. Despite this, the police initially claimed that there had been a series of electrical incidents on the tube lines.
7. No credible witnesses have identified any of the alleged bombers, or reported seeing anybody, on the tubes or the bus, carrying a rucksack.
8. None of the families and friends of the alleged bombers believe that the men were radical Islamic terrorists. The two jihadi videos cited as evidence of their evil intent, even if authentic, were filmed a long time before 07/07/05, and there was no mention about their plans to martyr themselves.
As the anonymous British director who made LUDICROUS DIVERSION said, “that July 7th was a False Flag Operation is not the unsustainable conspiracy theory”. It is the government’s official version of events that does not stand up to objective analysis.
The kind of answers that would be provided by a government appointed ‘independent inquiry’ would almost certainly protect those who have the most to lose. Therefore, it is our responsibility to research the London Bombings for ourselves, so that we might construct a facts-based argument that could be sustained in a court of law, should that become necessary.
The alternative is to believe the official version of events, which might condemn us to future False Flag Terrorist Operations, as well as contributing to the continued erosion of our birthrights and freedoms, stolen from us in the name of keeping us safe and secure.
“The bombers are certain to have been caught on many cameras during their journey… we will end up with very good pictures that identify them.”
Andy Hayman, Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner, July 7th 2005.
“Two weeks before he disappeared he called my mother to his room. He was sitting on the bed and asked her to get rid of the spider in there. He was so gentle…
We’ve not been shown any other forensic evidence to link him. It’s just the credit card. I still think there will be evidence to prove he is innocent.”
Hasib Hussein’s brother, August 2nd 2005.
“I don’t know whether that was my son. Neither I nor his wife have been able to identify him.”
Jamal Lindsay’s mother, quoted in The Times, in late July 2005.
7/7 Research Links
