“Whoever may be guilty of abuse of power, be it Government, State, Employer, Trade Union or whoever, the law must provide a speedy remedy. Otherwise the victims will find their own remedy.”
Alfred Thompson “Tom” Denning, 23 January 1899 – 5 March 1999.
Over the course of the last eighteen months I have watched the Illuminati Empire I have studied for more than ten years begin to crumble into shiny ruins before my exhausted eyes. This has been catalysed by the controlled demolition of what formerly appeared to be the sovereignty of the independent nation state, for the sole purpose of replacing one quintisentially elitist, violently corporatist, piratical, feudal hierarchy with another version of the same unelected, unaccountable and private World Government, bought and paid for by international banksters and the surviving royal bloodlines more than a century ago, when they first realised that their Empire of Excess was being threatened by the growing awareness of the starving masses, many millions of whom were conned or forced into sacrificing their lives on the whims of the moneyed aristocracy.
Peripheral circumstances would appear to have changed considerably since the genocide known as World War II, but the controlling group of consolidated interests and hereditary privileges that is responsible for the murder of hundreds of millions of men, women and children, fraud on a multinational and industrial scale and the theft of the land from the lidigenous peoples of this beautiful planet, still like to think they reign over us, whether we choose to believe it or not.
Over the course of the last couple of years I have witnessed friends and associates lose their homes over alleged debts that cannot be substantiated. Time and again the Courts have ignored perfectly legitimate administrative processes served on the banksters by individuals who conditionally agree to settle all verifiable liabilities upon receipt of the following items:
1. A legally enforceable bilateral contract signed by both parties.
2. A bill or invoice signed by the CEO of the company.
3. The actual accounting of the alleged lender’s losses.
In the most simplistic terms, under English law, whether a loan agreement is governed by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 or the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, if a bankster cannot produce a document signed by the alleged lender and the borrower, containing all of the prescribed terms and conditions of the loan, there is no legally enforceable contract.
This is well established in English case law with regard to consumer credit agreements, as per the House of Lords ruling on Wilson v First County Trust. Not surprisingly, credit card companies now seem rather reluctant to issue legal proceedings against customers who question the validity of an alleged debt. However, I have not yet heard that anybody has ever received a signed bill or invoice from the chief executive officer of an alleged creditor and the banksters continue to sucessfully rely upon photocopied statements of account in substantiation of their losses to the English Courts.
The apparent legal presumption of the veracity of the banksters’ claims is quite simply anathema to a just legal system, which also stands as yet more compelling evidence that the internationalists have bought, blackmailed and bullied the judiciary of the lower courts into overlooking the recent changes to the law.
Whilst victories against credit card and mortgage companies, both in and out of Court, are the talk of internet forums right across the planet, with Bank of America now having frozen all bank foreclosures in 50 states, the vast majority of U.K. Courts continue to protect the banksters from accusations of fraud, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment.
It is perfectly understandable that many of the victims of these crimes, especially those who have been through the turbulent processes of civil litigation, consider it nigh on impossible to obtain justice from within the established system, giving rise to a seemingly reasonable assumption that this is because the presiding judges are all hopelessly corrupt and/or in the employ of the banksters.
However, from my own experience of the Courts, it has been demonstrated to me that most of the time, the real adversary of justice is cognitive disonance, rather than endemic corruption. In other words, the lawyers, barristers and judges cannot even conceive of the idea that the law of negotiable instruments has been very rarely been applied correctly since the Gold Standard was abolished in 1931. That being the case, even when the law is applied correctly by Litigants in Person, the Courts almost always dismiss such a claim as “totally without merit in English law”, which is, ironically enough, totally without merit in English law.
Over the course of the last six months I have gathered together a treasure trove of statutory provisions and eminent legal authorities, which prove beyond reasonable doubt that a Promissory Note made payable to bearer on demand is considered, in law and equity, to be as good as cash or cleared funds in the hands of a banker. This was also held to be the case pre-1931, even when a promise to pay was a pledge to pay in bank notes that could be redeemed in gold.
Whilst it is only a matter of time until the necessary precedents are set in the Courts of these lands, every day, good-hearted, honest and honourable people are being thrown out of the homes for not repaying money that wasn’t lent to them in the first place. Therefore, perhaps the most efficient way to expedite the process of setting those legal precedents is to issue mass claims against every commercial bank. Known as Class Action suits in America, in the Courts of England & Wales these types of proceedings are known as Representative Actions or Group Litigations and are governed by Parts 19.6 and 19.11 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
In the event that the District Registrys are flooded with hundreds or even thousands of claimants, who, for all intents and purposes, were putting forward the same allegations, substantially supported by valid administrative processes, clearly prescribed statutory provisions, utterly compelling case law and diligent adherence to the Civil Procedure Rules and Practice Directions, the result would almost certainly be a “Test Case” in the High Court. In the event that the verdict of such a proceeding was handed down in favour of the claimants, the entire banking industry would be shackled by the unforgiving exposure of an industrial scale fraud that the Courts would be unable to ignore.
It has recently been estimated that tens of thousands of American mortgagors had foreclosure proceedings suspended by the U.S. Courts in 2010, on the basis that the alleged lenders could not provide the original mortgage contracts and/or deeds, without which no legal charge against a property can be legally enforced, resulting in the suspension of all foreclosures by Bank of America, among other deeply concerned banksters.
Whilst the English law of mortgages is more subtle and complex, the principles are identical, since U.S law was founded upon the former legal system. Sooner or later, an honourable member of the British judiciary will comprehend that the legal professions have been so preoccupied servicing the fraudulent debt industry that they have failed to recognise the herd of elephants in the corner of the room; they are getting shafted just like virtually everybody else.
“Should a judge in the most subordinate jurisdiction be defficient in the knowledge of the law, it would reflect infinite contempt upon himself, and disgrace upon those who employ him…But how much more serious and affecting is the case of a superior judge, if without any skill in the law he will boldly venture to decide a question upon which the welfare and subsistence of whole families may depend, where the chance of him judging right, or wrong, is barely equal; and where if he chances to judge wrong, he does an injury of the most alarming nature, an injury without possibility of redress.”
William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765-69).
